-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add figures, text and refs for water4energy implementation #19
Conversation
- Fixing merge conflicts I created by editing main.bib on the other branch, sorry!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added one commit to tidy up a merge conflict that appeared because I made some changes to main.bib in #20—sorry!
Only did a quick read-through of the text and equations. A couple minor changes, but otherwise good to go from my perspective.
air cooling), with the investment into and operation of the cooling technologies included in the | ||
optimization decision variables. This enables MESSAGE to choose the type of cooling technology | ||
for each power plant type and track how the operation of the cooling technologies impact water | ||
withdrawals, return flows, thermal pollution and parasitic electricity use. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oxford comma? @volker-krey what's the preferred style?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no opinion on this and even had to look up what the 'Oxford comma' is. Let's take a vote in tomorrow's meeting.
@scparkinson this looks very good to me. From a structure perspective, it might make sense to split the water section into water for energy, water for land and other uses (industry, residential). This would mirror the structure under emissions where we also have an energy and land part. Any thoughts on this? |
I can definitely add the description of the other water uses but purposefully left out in this case because it was initially indicated just to include the water for energy part. Please let me know if you want me to add the description of the other water uses. |
@scparkinson thanks for the offer, but I would suggest that for the moment we keep it at the level you have provided which is consistent with the mainstream version of the global model version. I just thought that structurally it would make sense to anticipate that other components than "water for energy" will be added at some point. |
#18
#18
Energy: add water for energy implementation @scparkinson