-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Predicted Contacts #41
Comments
Thank you for raising this issue. Predicted residue-residue contacts are handled as part of the modeling dictionary extension, which is currently under development. Considering the complexities involved in the representation of multi-scale models, we also plan to incorporate definitions for predicted residue-residue contacts in the integrative/hybrid methods dictionary extension. We will update this issue once it is implemented. |
CASP RR format is an example of a typically used format for predicted residue-residue contacts. |
The dictionary has been updated to include predicted contacts. @rub1k please verify if the new category |
I can verify the new category is exactly what we needed! |
This would be thus the way to list predicted contacts from co-evolution analysis I assume. |
Yes, exactly! |
Predicted residue-residue contacts are another commonly used form of distance restraints, like crosslinks. They are commonly used together with crosslinks in integrative modeling. I cannot find explicit support for them in the current form of the dictionary - should general_distance_constraints from the NMR-Star dictionary be used for that? Are they compatible with the IHM dict? Can multiple extensions be used together? Sorry if that is obvious, I'm not so deep into mmCIF yet :)
Best,
Lukas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: