Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Predicted Contacts #41

Closed
lhoenig opened this issue Sep 15, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Predicted Contacts #41

lhoenig opened this issue Sep 15, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lhoenig
Copy link
Collaborator

lhoenig commented Sep 15, 2017

Predicted residue-residue contacts are another commonly used form of distance restraints, like crosslinks. They are commonly used together with crosslinks in integrative modeling. I cannot find explicit support for them in the current form of the dictionary - should general_distance_constraints from the NMR-Star dictionary be used for that? Are they compatible with the IHM dict? Can multiple extensions be used together? Sorry if that is obvious, I'm not so deep into mmCIF yet :)
Best,
Lukas

@brindakv
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for raising this issue. Predicted residue-residue contacts are handled as part of the modeling dictionary extension, which is currently under development. Considering the complexities involved in the representation of multi-scale models, we also plan to incorporate definitions for predicted residue-residue contacts in the integrative/hybrid methods dictionary extension. We will update this issue once it is implemented.

@brindakv brindakv self-assigned this Sep 18, 2017
@brindakv
Copy link
Collaborator

CASP RR format is an example of a typically used format for predicted residue-residue contacts.

@brindakv
Copy link
Collaborator

brindakv commented Oct 4, 2017

The dictionary has been updated to include predicted contacts. @rub1k please verify if the new category ihm_predicted_contact_restraint sufficiently captures the information that you require.

@brindakv brindakv closed this as completed Oct 9, 2017
@lhoenig
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lhoenig commented Oct 11, 2017

I can verify the new category is exactly what we needed!

@amjjbonvin
Copy link

This would be thus the way to list predicted contacts from co-evolution analysis I assume.

@lhoenig
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lhoenig commented Oct 11, 2017

Yes, exactly!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants