Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider consolidating into id-tagging-schema repo #35

Open
tyrasd opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

consider consolidating into id-tagging-schema repo #35

tyrasd opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@tyrasd
Copy link
Collaborator

tyrasd commented Jan 18, 2022

Let's discuss the suggestion from d9c23fa#commitcomment-64100888:

[This repository could just be] some build scripts in the id-tagging-schema repo.

Right out of the box, I would agree.
I thought that there was a perhaps a reason for the repositories being structured like this. Perhaps some forks are using it to maintain their own set of presets?! Maybe @quincylvania could explain the original reasoning?

@tyrasd tyrasd changed the title consider consolidating consider consolidating into id-tagging-schema repo Jan 18, 2022
@1ec5
Copy link

1ec5 commented Jan 18, 2022

The idea probably was in pursuit of a schema-agnostic iD. I don’t know if any forks are maintaining their own tagging schemas, but in principle a tasking manager could be set up to tailor the presets to a task-specific set or something. JOSM has this capability with swappable preset packs, but I’m not sure about the level of demand for iD to support something similar. I personally find this separate repository limiting, because we haven’t fully built out the meta-schema for id-tagging-schema yet – there are plenty of field types worth adding, for example.

@westnordost
Copy link

westnordost commented May 30, 2022

(FWIW as an irregular contributor, I (also) have found it confusing which to find in in which repo)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants