keyword "interfacecheck" is ignored by "run_framework"

[wangcj05]

---

Issue Description

What did you expect to see happen?

run_framework should work with keyword interfacecheck

What did you see instead?

interfacecheck is ignored.

Do you have a suggested fix for the development team?

Please attach the input file(s) that generate this error. The simpler the input, the faster we can find the issue.

---

For Change Control Board: Issue Review

This review should occur before any development is performed as a response to this issue.

• 1. Is it tagged with a type: defect or improvement?
• 2. Is it tagged with a priority: critical, normal or minor?
• 3. If it will impact requirements or requirements tests, is it tagged with requirements?
• 4. If it is a defect, can it cause wrong results for users? If so an email needs to be sent to the users.
• 5. Is a rationale provided? (Such as explaining why the improvement is needed or why current code is wrong.)

---

For Change Control Board: Issue Closure

This review should occur when the issue is imminently going to be closed.

• 1. If the issue is a defect, is the defect fixed?
• 2. If the issue is a defect, is the defect tested for in the regression test system? (If not explain why not.)
• 3. If the issue can impact users, has an email to the users group been written (the email should specify if the defect impacts stable or master)?
• 4. If the issue is a defect, does it impact the latest stable branch? If yes, is there any issue tagged with stable (create if needed)?
• 5. If the issue is being closed without a merge request, has an explanation of why it is being closed been provided?

[alfoa]

@wangcj05 the closure checklist

[alfoa]

Closure checklist passed... No email is needed since the problem was effecting a "testing" feature that we currently not expose to the users

[wangcj05]

Should do, I just get used to data-object rework branch.

…

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Andrea Alfonsi - INL < ***@***.***> wrote: Closure checklist passed... No email is needed since the problem was effecting a "testing" feature that we currently not expose to the users — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_idaholab_raven_issues_440-23issuecomment-2D390808676&d=DwMCaQ&c=54IZrppPQZKX9mLzcGdPfFD1hxrcB__aEkJFOKJFd00&r=vJsbMjnzR6ErmdvVqv2kNhwbKhk1o91w6B8VQ4EHCto&m=9uhi2lzr944XUYz-7pd9CjKIhlm6kq6XIMT7n6h5ihA&s=R8udXvoF-V8Uko9uaobuvdUV3L7V0Xnt7Y9gRrl1jPI&e=>, or mute the thread <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_AG-2D17y7X0ZCuMhei5lbbFCkVaLR1w89Uks5t00fXgaJpZM4Qtqe1&d=DwMCaQ&c=54IZrppPQZKX9mLzcGdPfFD1hxrcB__aEkJFOKJFd00&r=vJsbMjnzR6ErmdvVqv2kNhwbKhk1o91w6B8VQ4EHCto&m=9uhi2lzr944XUYz-7pd9CjKIhlm6kq6XIMT7n6h5ihA&s=yE3pt5pKc0etyv0sY4f0gdD0l7fCaeoyn-47qDducpM&e=> .

-- Sincerely, Congjian Wang PhD, Nuclear Engineering Methods Development, INL 2525 North Fremont Ave., Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3860 Work Phone: 208-526-7220