-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relicense under dual Apache2/MIT #28
Comments
Permission granted. |
Permission granted to relicense my changes to dual apache 2/MIT. (I can't tick the box) |
Permission granted. |
Permission granted. And thank you for ticking me off :) |
Permission granted and sorry for the delay! |
Thanks everyone, I wish @daybarr would have agreed too but since his contribution was a simple typo fix, I’m going ahead anyway. Thanks everyone. |
Permission granted for my tiny typo contribution ;) Sorry, I somehow missed the original notification. I wondered why I was being sent the updates... |
ha perfect thanks :) |
structlog has historically been licensed under the Apache 2 license because it offers protection against certain patent-related jerk moves.
Unfortunately that also limits structlog’s usefulness because it’s incompatible with GPLv2 (yes I don’t like the GPL but I also don’t like “eye for an eye”).
Over at cryptography we’ve consulted an actual IP lawyer, and turns out a dual license fixes this: pyca/cryptography#1209
Therefore I’d like to re-license the project under a dual Apache 2/MIT license which gives me best of both worlds.
For that, I have to ask my contributors for permission. According to GitHub, that are the following ones:
Please be so kind and reply with something along of “Permission granted.” to this ticket and I’ll tick you off (this sentence has been edited, @radix is in fact capable of reading :)).
Thank you!
P.S. Changes by those who don’t agree will be re-written. So your veto won’t stop the change; sorry. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: