You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I attempted to re-conduct the experiments on the Virtual KITTI dataset and observed that the quality of decomposition is good only within the ego-static sequence. However, when the ego car is in motion, it degrades significantly, as illustrated below:
*The model was trained on Scene06 using the file configs/vkitti2-06.yaml
Fig. 1: Clear separation (frame 0)
Fig. 2: Bad separation (frame 267)
Fig. 3: Forward flow (frame 267)
In my opinion, the flow estimated from ego motion is mainly the cause here.
Could you tell me what adjustment I need to do in order to achieve better separation in this case?
The modification I made in the configuration to suite my hardware:
train_downscale_factor = 2
train_num_rays_per_batch = 3000
use correspondences to calculate flow
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear authors,
I attempted to re-conduct the experiments on the Virtual KITTI dataset and observed that the quality of decomposition is good only within the ego-static sequence. However, when the ego car is in motion, it degrades significantly, as illustrated below:
*The model was trained on
Scene06
using the fileconfigs/vkitti2-06.yaml
Fig. 1: Clear separation (frame 0)
Fig. 2: Bad separation (frame 267)
Fig. 3: Forward flow (frame 267)
In my opinion, the flow estimated from ego motion is mainly the cause here.
Could you tell me what adjustment I need to do in order to achieve better separation in this case?
The modification I made in the configuration to suite my hardware:
train_downscale_factor = 2
train_num_rays_per_batch = 3000
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: