Terser Function Declaration Syntax without ()

[msadeqhe]

Consider this function declaration syntax:

fnc1: () -> i32 = 10;

What's your opinion if we could drop () from it?

fnc1: -> i32 = 10;

And in lambda:

: -> i32 = 10

Finally, it would be:

a: () -> i32 = 10;
b: -> i32 = 10;
c: i32 = 10;

a and b are functions, but c is a variable.

[msadeqhe]

BTW, I think because () is required to call functions, it seems reasonable to require () in function declarations too. In other words, the current syntax looks good in which () is required to declare functions even if the parameter list is empty.

[AbhinavK00]

I agree with this, () screams a function to me so it may as well be there for all kinds of functions.