Skip to content

hennna/data-plane-api

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Envoy v2 JSON REST and gRPC APIs

Goals

This repository contains the draft v2 JSON REST and gRPC Envoy APIs. Envoy today has a number of JSON REST APIs through which it may discover and have updated its runtime configuration from some management server. These are:

Version 2 of the Envoy API will evolve existing APIs and introduce new APIs to:

  • Allow for more advanced load balancing through load and resource utilization reporting to management servers.
  • Improve N^2 health check scalability issues by optionally offloading health checking to other Envoy instances.
  • Support Envoy deployment in edge, sidecar and middle proxy deployment models via changes to the listener model and CDS/SDS APIs.
  • Allow streaming updates from the management server on change, instead of polling APIs from Envoy. gRPC APIs will be supported alongside JSON REST APIs to provide for this.
  • Ensure all Envoy runtime configuration is dynamically discoverable via API calls, including listener configuration, certificates and runtime settings, which are today sourced from the filesystem. There will still remain a static bootstrap configuration file that will specify items unlikely to change during runtime, including the Envoy node identity, xDS management server addresses, administration interface and tracing configuration.
  • Revisit and where appropriate cleanup any v1 technical debt.

Status

The LDS/CDS/EDS/RDS APIs are now frozen and will maintain backwards compatibility according to standard proto rules (e.g. new fields will not reuse tags, field types will not change, fields will not be renumbered, etc.).

The remainder of the API (ADS, HDS, RLS, filter fragments other than HTTP connection manager, the bootstrap proto) are draft work-in-progress. Input is welcome via issue filing. Small, localized PRs are also welcome, but any major changes or suggestions should be coordinated in a tracking issue with the authors.

Implementation work has begun and work items are tracked at here.

New features that correspond to the v2 API are initially tracked in this repository. When they are agreed upon and the related PRs are merged, they should be closed out and a corresponding issue created in https://github.com/lyft/envoy/ and tagged with v2 API. A reference to the closed issue should also be included.

Principles

  • Proto3 will be used to specify the canonical API. This will provide directly the gRPC API and via gRPC-JSON transcoding the JSON REST API. A textual YAML input will be supported for filesystem configuration files (e.g. the bootstrap file), in addition to JSON, as a syntactic convenience. YAML file contents will be internally converted to JSON and then follow the standard JSON-proto3 conversion during Envoy config ingestion.

  • xDS APIs should support eventual consistency. For example, if RDS references a cluster that has not yet been supplied by CDS, it should be silently ignored and traffic not forwarded until the CDS update occurs. Stronger consistency guarantees are possible if the management server is able to sequence the xDS APIs carefully (for example by using the ADS API below). By following the [CDS, EDS, LDS, RDS] sequence for all pertinent resources, it will be possible to avoid traffic outages during configuration update.

  • The API is primarily intended for machine generation and consumption. It is expected that the management server is responsible for mapping higher level configuration concepts to API responses. Similarly, static configuration fragments may be generated by templating tools, etc. The APIs and tools used to generate xDS configuration are beyond the scope of the definitions in this repository.

  • REST-JSON API equivalents will be provided for the basic singleton xDS subscription services CDS/EDS/LDS/EDS. Advanced APIs such as HDS, ADS and EDS multi-dimensional LB will be gRPC only. This avoids having to map complicated bidirectional stream semantics onto REST.

  • Listeners will be immutable. Any updates to a listener via LDS will require the draining of existing connections for the specific bound IP/port. As a result, new requests will only be guaranteed to observe the new configuration after existing connections have drained or the drain timeout.

  • Versioning will be expressed via proto3 package namespaces, i.e. package envoy.api.v2;.

  • Custom components (e.g. filters, resolvers, loggers) will use a reverse DNS naming scheme, e.g. com.google.widget, com.lyft.widget.

  • Wrapped protobuf fields should be used for all non-string scalar types, to support non-zero default values. While only some fields require wrapping, for consistency we prefer to have all non-string scalar fields wrapped.

APIs

Unless otherwise stated, the APIs with the same names as v1 APIs have a similar role.

In addition to the above APIs, an aggregation API will be provided to allow for fine grained control over the sequencing of API updates across discovery services:

  • Aggregated Discovery Service (ADS). While fundamentally Envoy employs an eventual consistency model, ADS provides an opportunity to sequence API update pushes and ensure affinity of a single management server for an Envoy node for API updates. ADS allows one or more APIs to be delivered on a single gRPC bidi stream by the management server, and within an API to have all resources aggregated onto a single stream. Without this, some APIs such as RDS and EDS may require the management of multiple streams and connections to distinct management servers.

    ADS will allow for hitless updates of configuration by appropriate sequencing. For example, suppose foo.com was mappped to cluster X. We wish to change the mapping in the route table to point foo.com at cluster Y. In order to do this, a CDS/EDS update must first be delivered containing both clusters X and Y.

    Without ADS, the CDS/EDS/RDS streams may point at distinct management servers, or when on the same management server at distinct gRPC streams/connections that require coordination. The EDS resource requests may be split across two distinct streams, one for X and one for Y. ADS allows these to be coalesced to a single stream to a single management server, avoiding the need for distributed synchronization to correctly sequence the update. With ADS, the management server would deliver the CDS, EDS and then RDS updates on a single stream.

Terminology

Some relevant existing terminology is repeated below and some new v2 terms introduced.

  • Cluster: A cluster is a group of logically similar endpoints that Envoy connects to. In v2, RDS routes points to clusters, CDS provides cluster configuration and Envoy discovers the cluster members via EDS.

  • Downstream: A downstream host connects to Envoy, sends requests, and receives responses.

  • Endpoint: An endpoint is an upstream host that is a member of one or more clusters. Endpoints are discovered via EDS.

  • Listener: A listener is a named network location (e.g., port, unix domain socket, etc.) that can be connected to by downstream clients. Envoy exposes one or more listeners that downstream hosts connect to.

  • Locality: A location where an Envoy instance or an endpoint runs. This includes region, zone and sub-zone identification.

  • Management server: A logical server implementing the v2 Envoy APIs. This is not necessarily a single physical machine since it may be replicated/sharded and API serving for different xDS APIs may be implemented on different physical machines.

  • Region: Geographic region where a zone is located.

  • Sub-zone: Location within a zone where an Envoy instance or an endpoint runs. This allows for multiple load balancing targets within a zone.

  • Upstream: An upstream host receives connections and requests from Envoy and returns responses.

  • xDS: CDS/EDS/HDS/LDS/RLS/RDS APIs.

  • Zone: Availability Zone (AZ) in AWS, Zone in GCP.

About

Envoy REST/proto API definitions

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Protocol Buffer 91.0%
  • Python 5.7%
  • Shell 2.2%
  • C++ 1.1%