Complete the No- variants of language extensions and Strict extension #1238
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ailrun
reviewed
Jan 20, 2021
Ailrun
changed the title
Fixes haskell#1187. Separate the list of pragmas used for completion from the list of pragmas used to suggest enabling a language extension to fix an error. The former now include the `No-` variants of the language extensions, e.g., `NoDuplicateRecordFields`.
mrBliss
force-pushed
the
mrBliss/complete-no-extensions
branch
from
f34b8a7 to
8f58652
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1187.
Separate the list of pragmas used for completion from the list of pragmas used
to suggest enabling a language extension to fix an error. The former now include
the
No-variants of the language extensions, e.g.,NoDuplicateRecordFields.