Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

helm-framework: ModifyPlan refactor 2 #1514

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

BBBmau
Copy link
Contributor

@BBBmau BBBmau commented Oct 24, 2024

Description

- [ ] refactor plan.Lint.ValueBool() to be it's own PlanModifier 974fdeb
- [for later] Perhaps we can decompose the ModifyPlan function into more discrete planModifiers on a per resource basis, i.e for version, manifest <- This is up for discussion. Since the initial implementation just seems like a lot more code than what it was previously.

Acceptance tests

  • Have you added an acceptance test for the functionality being added?

Release Note

Release note for CHANGELOG:

...

References

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

@BBBmau BBBmau marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2024 22:44
@BBBmau BBBmau requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2024 22:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/XS and removed size/M labels Oct 25, 2024
@JaylonmcShan03
Copy link
Contributor

  • The error handling is more descriptive, and uses diagnostics which is better!

  • I agree, because it aligns with maintaining the correct state, preventing unnecessary recomputation (I think thats the correct wording haha) by using the previous state version if available

@BBBmau BBBmau merged commit d825fd0 into helm-framework Oct 25, 2024
5 of 14 checks passed
@BBBmau BBBmau deleted the modify-plan-refactor-2 branch October 25, 2024 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants