You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.
Please do not leave +1 or me too comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.
If an issue is assigned to the modular-magician user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If an issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If an issue is assigned to hashibot, a community member has claimed the issue already.
I have an instance that was created without a service_account block, so it has no service account configured (which is not the Console/API default behaviour, but that's ok).
I later wanted to add the default Compute service account to this VMs with no scopes (so that I can enable VM Manager and OS Patching on my instance).
I expected that by adding this block, Terraform would configure the default Compute service account with an empty scopes list for the VM, since the doc states that when email is empty, it defaults to the default Compute service account.
service_account {
scopes=[]
}
Actual Behavior
Nothing! No service account configured.
Plan looks like this:
I am not sure if the behaviour is known or intended. I guess the empty scopes list results in Terraform somehow displaying a diff but not applying anything?
This is definitely not a big deal, but I was a bit surprised.
Thanks! :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 30, 2021
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Community Note
modular-magician
user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If an issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If an issue is assigned tohashibot
, a community member has claimed the issue already.Terraform Version
Affected Resource(s)
Terraform Configuration Files
First
and then
Expected Behavior
I have an instance that was created without a
service_account
block, so it has no service account configured (which is not the Console/API default behaviour, but that's ok).I later wanted to add the default Compute service account to this VMs with no scopes (so that I can enable VM Manager and OS Patching on my instance).
I expected that by adding this block, Terraform would configure the default Compute service account with an empty scopes list for the VM, since the doc states that when
email
is empty, it defaults to the default Compute service account.Actual Behavior
Nothing! No service account configured.
Plan looks like this:
Apply succeeds but the VM is not modified, and the next plan shows the same diff.
Steps to Reproduce
service_account
block)service_account
block with an emptyscopes
listterraform plan
Important Factoids
An acceptable workaround is to fetch the service account email manually and insert it in the
service_account
block:I am not sure if the behaviour is known or intended. I guess the empty scopes list results in Terraform somehow displaying a diff but not applying anything?
This is definitely not a big deal, but I was a bit surprised.
Thanks! :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: