-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unexpected machine re-creation while using resource google_notebooks_instance #8216
Unexpected machine re-creation while using resource google_notebooks_instance #8216
Comments
There's the same behaviour if you try to change the machine_type value.
When, doing the same operation via UI, you just have to turn off the machine and change type. |
Hi, I tried to execute the same command using the new provider version
but I still have the same behaviour. |
@skymarchettis it has been built into below version. Can you try it and let me know the result? https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google/releases/tag/v3.54.0 |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
This issue was originally opened by @skymarchettis as hashicorp/terraform#27494. It was migrated here as a result of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.
Hi,
I'm using the google_notebooks_instance resource but I'm giving unexpected behaviors while trying to change it.
After a variable value change, only an in-place update should be performed for the resource which is destroyed and recreated instead.
Using the console, these changes can be done in "hot" mode while keeping the same machine.
Terraform Version
Terraform Configuration Files
Expected Behavior
Actual Behavior
Additional Context
Another strange behavior is that if a resource was created with
no_remove_data_disk = true
, it's created correctly withkeep disk
enabled. But if I run the plan again, the output shows~ no_remove_data_disk = false -> true
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: