Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

google_bigquery_dataset_iam_member doesn't handle deleted members #8132

Closed
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ralbertazzi
Copy link

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.
  • Please do not leave +1 or me too comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.
  • If an issue is assigned to the modular-magician user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If an issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If an issue is assigned to hashibot, a community member has claimed the issue already.

Description

Opening again the issue described in #7896. Please reference that issue for all information. As I've written there, it seems that the provider fails parsing deleted: entities and Google's guidelines explicitly say that configuration-as-code tools should be updated to recognize the new prefix.

References

@slevenick
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like this comment correctly identifies the problem code. This should only impact bigquery_dataset_iam resources due to the unique handling there.

Should be fixable with similar logic to https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules/blob/master/third_party/terraform/utils/iam.go.erb#L237

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 15, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.