Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"terraform apply" is not idempotent with a bigquery dataset with an access #5152

Closed
pc-tradelab opened this issue Dec 12, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
bug forward/review In review; remove label to forward service/bigquery

Comments

@pc-tradelab
Copy link

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment
  • If an issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If an issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If an issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.

Terraform Version

Terraform v0.12.17

  • provider.google v3.2.0

Affected Resource(s)

  • google_bigquery_dataset

Terraform Configuration Files

provider "google" {
  project = <YOUT PROJECT HERE>
}

resource "google_service_account" "service_account_test" {
  account_id = "sa-test"
  display_name = "SA for testing purpose"
}

resource "google_bigquery_dataset" "dataset" {
  dataset_id                  = "test_tf"
  friendly_name               = "TF test"
  description                 = ""

  access {
    role   = "READER"
    user_by_email = google_service_account.service_account_test.email
  }
}

Debug Output

Expected Behavior

"terraform apply" should be idempotent

Actual Behavior

At the second apply , we have :
Error: Error updating Dataset "projects/XXX/datasets/test_tf": googleapi: Error 400: Cannot remove all owners from a dataset., invalid

Steps to Reproduce

terraform init
terraform apply -auto-approve
# OK -> Dataset created
terraform apply -auto-approve
# KO -> The apply operation wants to remove the owner since it is not in tf file but it is forbidden
  • #0000
@ghost ghost added the bug label Dec 12, 2019
@griffinator76
Copy link

See also #3990 and possibly #2686

@edwardmedia edwardmedia self-assigned this Dec 13, 2019
@edwardmedia
Copy link
Contributor

edwardmedia commented Dec 13, 2019

you can see below detail after tf plan. Notice it tries to update by removing two accesses and add one access

  # google_bigquery_dataset.dataset will be updated in-place
  ~ resource "google_bigquery_dataset" "dataset" {
        ......
        self_link                       = "https://www.googleapis.com/bigquery/v2/projects/myproject/datasets/test_tf"

      - access {
          - role          = "OWNER" -> null
          - user_by_email = "[email protected]" -> null
        }
      - access {
          - role          = "READER" -> null
          - user_by_email = "[email protected]" -> null
        }
      + access {
          + role          = "READER"
          + user_by_email = "[email protected]"
        }
    }  

@rileykarson
Copy link
Collaborator

@pc-tradelab: Sorry about the behaviour here. Terraform is authoritative on the access field when set, and ignores it (treating it as output-only, specifically) when it's unset.

Instead of the intuitive behaviour- adding the access entry to your config adds that access entry- what your config has told Terraform is "start managing access, and I'd like exactly this list of entries". If you look at the output of terraform plan like in @edwardmedia's response, you'll see the entries that are already present. If you add those to your config, this should work as expected.

#3990 tracks adding a resource that has your expected behaviour, managing single access entries. I'm closing this as a duplicate of that issue.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 28, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 28, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added service/bigquery forward/review In review; remove label to forward labels Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug forward/review In review; remove label to forward service/bigquery
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants