Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"azurerm_spring_cloud_app" - supports property https_only, is_public, persistent_disk #9957

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2021

Conversation

njuCZ
Copy link
Contributor

@njuCZ njuCZ commented Dec 21, 2020

spring cloud app supports more properties: https_only, is_public, persistent_disk

https_only and persistent_disk could only be set by update, creat rest api will ignore those values

image

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @njuCZ - this LGTM 👍

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.43.0 milestone Jan 8, 2021
@katbyte katbyte merged commit 439486a into hashicorp:master Jan 8, 2021
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2021
@katbyte katbyte modified the milestones: v2.43.0, v2.42.0 Jan 8, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 8, 2021

This has been released in version 2.42.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.42.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 7, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 7, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants