-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[azurerm_storage_account] support for the enable_advanced_threat_protection
property
#3782
[azurerm_storage_account] support for the enable_advanced_threat_protection
property
#3782
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @benjamin37,
Thank you for the PR! Overall this is looking really great with a few fairly minor comments i've left inline. Once those are addressed this should be good to merge 🙂
(also this is perfect, and mimics the SQL one mentioned in the issue)
enable_advanced_threat_protection
property
Hi @katbyte, thanks for the fast reply and your feedback! I've commited the changes you requested. Just let me know if there is anything else to do for this pull request. Kind regards |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the revisions @benjamin37, this LGTM now 🙂
This has been released in version 1.32.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 1.32.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
I'm not sure about the following point of this pull request. Advanced Threat Protection is a feature you can set on a storage account. However it is set with a separate client
AdvancedThreatProtectionClient
and not with theStorageServiceClient
. Is it common practice to create a new resource for this setting instead of adding it to the storage account itself?Relates to issue #3670
(fixes #3670)