Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

containerservice - update sdk to 2024-05-01 #27105

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

ms-henglu
Copy link
Contributor

@ms-henglu ms-henglu commented Aug 20, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)
image

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_resource - support for the thing1 property [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@ms-henglu ms-henglu marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2024 06:38
@ms-henglu
Copy link
Contributor Author

I fixed some of the failed tests:

=== RUN   TestAccKubernetesClusterNodePool_upgradeSettings
=== PAUSE TestAccKubernetesClusterNodePool_upgradeSettings
=== CONT  TestAccKubernetesClusterNodePool_upgradeSettings
--- PASS: TestAccKubernetesClusterNodePool_upgradeSettings (980.86s)
PASS

=== RUN   TestAccKubernetesCluster_upgradeSettings
=== PAUSE TestAccKubernetesCluster_upgradeSettings
=== CONT  TestAccKubernetesCluster_upgradeSettings
--- PASS: TestAccKubernetesCluster_upgradeSettings (784.12s)
PASS

=== RUN   TestAccKubernetesCluster_updateNetworkProfileOutboundType
=== PAUSE TestAccKubernetesCluster_updateNetworkProfileOutboundType
=== CONT  TestAccKubernetesCluster_updateNetworkProfileOutboundType
--- PASS: TestAccKubernetesCluster_updateNetworkProfileOutboundType (2447.55s)
PASS

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ms-henglu LGTM 💯

I left one question regarding the removed delete options, it would be good to understand what the behavioural change there is (if there is one) so we can document it in the upgrade guide.

Comment on lines -3208 to -3211
ignorePodDisruptionBudget := true
err = client.DeleteThenPoll(ctx, *id, managedclusters.DeleteOperationOptions{
IgnorePodDisruptionBudget: &ignorePodDisruptionBudget,
})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ms-henglu could you find out from the service team what the default behaviour for delete operations on the stable API version is? Are PDBs respected by default or ignored?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @stephybun , I just confirmed with service team, that this is a preview feature, if not using it, the PDBs will be respected by default.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the confirmation 👍

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 35298b7 into hashicorp:main Aug 21, 2024
36 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.117.0 milestone Aug 21, 2024
@stephybun stephybun modified the milestones: v3.117.0, v4.0.0 Aug 21, 2024
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants