Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_kubernetes_cluster - do not compare max_count against node_count for updates to the default node pool when autoscaler is enabled #26417

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

mcleanbc
Copy link
Contributor

@mcleanbc mcleanbc commented Jun 21, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

When autoscaler is enabled, node_count sets only the initial number of nodes. Before this PR, the provider was comparing max_count against the current node_count (even if not specified in the terraform resource) during updates to the default node pool when autoscaler was enabled, preventing scale down operations from occurring (because the current node count would exceed the new max count).

Now, the provider enforces comparisons between node_count and max_count only when creating the default node pool. This matches the behavior of the comparison between node_count and min_count on ln 1400.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

azurerm_kubernetes_cluster - do not compare max_count against node_count for updates to the default node pool when autoscaler is enabled

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #18148

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@mcleanbc mcleanbc marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 03:05
@mcleanbc mcleanbc changed the title azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool - do not compare max_count against node_count for updates to the default node pool when autoscaler is enabled azurerm_kubernetes_cluster - do not compare max_count against node_count for updates to the default node pool when autoscaler is enabled Jun 21, 2024
@catriona-m catriona-m requested a review from stephybun June 25, 2024 15:13
Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mcleanbc LGTM 👍

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 00db54e into hashicorp:main Jul 31, 2024
2 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.114.0 milestone Jul 31, 2024
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 31, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot reduce AKS auto-scale pool size even when default size not declared
2 participants