Assign policy to product

[MilanHtec984]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Terraform Version

1.3.9

AzureRM Provider Version

3.55.0

Affected Resource(s)/Data Source(s)

azurerm_api_management_product_policy

Terraform Configuration Files

terraform {
  required_version = "> 1.0.0"
  required_providers {
    azurerm = {
      source  = "hashicorp/azurerm"
      version = "> 3.0.0"
    }
  }
  backend "azurerm" {
    resource_group_name  = "xxxx"
    storage_account_name = "xxxx"
    container_name       = "xxxx"
    key                  = "xxxx"
  }
}

provider "azurerm" {
  features {}
}

Debug Output/Panic Output

The plugin encountered an error, and failed to respond to the plugin.(*GRPCProvider).ApplyResourceChange call. The plugin logs may contain more details.

Stack trace from the terraform-provider-azurerm_v3.55.0_x5.exe plugin:

panic: interface conversion: interface {} is nil, not map[string]interface {}

goroutine 1062 [running]:
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement.expandApiManagementApiContact(...)
        github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement/api_management_api_resource.go:777
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement.resourceApiManagementApiCreateUpdate(0x1d6cbc70, {0x6445c80, 0x1c1f2600})
        github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/apimanagement/api_management_api_resource.go:470 +0x2bf2
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/schema.(*Resource).create(0x1c0213b0, {0x763c580, 0x1d4ab428}, 0x1d6cbc70, {0x6445c80, 0x1c1f2600})
        github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/[email protected]/helper/schema/resource.go:695 +0x166
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/schema.(*Resource).Apply(0x1c0213b0, {0x763c580, 0x1d4ab428}, 0x1cf4bce0, 0x1d6cbb80, {0x6445c80, 0x1c1f2600})
        github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/[email protected]/helper/schema/resource.go:837 +0xa92
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/schema.(*GRPCProviderServer).ApplyResourceChange(0x1cff2120, {0x763c580, 0x1d4ab3c8}, 0x1d4450e0)
        github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/[email protected]/helper/schema/grpc_provider.go:1021 +0xfa4
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go/tfprotov5/tf5server.(*server).ApplyResourceChange(0x1c770050, {0x763c580, 0x1d4ab110}, 0x1c1b9440)
        github.com/hashicorp/[email protected]/tfprotov5/tf5server/server.go:818 +0x583
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go/tfprotov5/internal/tfplugin5._Provider_ApplyResourceChange_Handler({0x6a44300, 0x1c770050}, {0x763c580, 0x1d4ab110}, 0x1c1b9400, 0x0)
        github.com/hashicorp/[email protected]/tfprotov5/internal/tfplugin5/tfplugin5_grpc.pb.go:385 +0x18a
google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).processUnaryRPC(0x1c0aafc0, {0x7644a34, 0x1c196480}, 0x1c655ae0, 0x1cec18f0, 0xb8b6a00, 0x0)
        google.golang.org/[email protected]/server.go:1340 +0xe22
google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).handleStream(0x1c0aafc0, {0x7644a34, 0x1c196480}, 0x1c655ae0, 0x0)
        google.golang.org/[email protected]/server.go:1713 +0xa17
google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).serveStreams.func1.2()
        google.golang.org/[email protected]/server.go:965 +0xb1
created by google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).serveStreams.func1
        google.golang.org/[email protected]/server.go:963 +0x25f

Error: The terraform-provider-azurerm_v3.55.0_x5.exe plugin crashed!

Expected Behaviour

Policy should be added to the product.

Actual Behaviour

Crashed

Steps to Reproduce

No response

Important Factoids

No response

References

#21714

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.