azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target - support for access_policy_name

[magodo]

Add access_policy_name to azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target. The existing resources are guaranteed to use the access policy as default, so making it the default value should make no breaking change or unnecessary plan diff. For the same reason, I've updated the schema for the same property for azurerm_hpc_cache_blob_target.

Test Result

💤 make testacc TEST=./azurerm/internal/services/hpccache TESTARGS='-run "TestAccHPCCacheNFSTarget_accessPolicy"'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
==> Checking that Custom Timeouts are used...
==> Checking that acceptance test packages are used...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./azurerm/internal/services/hpccache -v -run "TestAccHPCCacheNFSTarget_accessPolicy" -timeout 180m -ldflags="-X=github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/version.ProviderVersion=acc"
2021/04/01 11:23:27 [DEBUG] not using binary driver name, it's no longer needed
2021/04/01 11:23:27 [DEBUG] not using binary driver name, it's no longer needed
=== RUN   TestAccHPCCacheNFSTarget_accessPolicy
=== PAUSE TestAccHPCCacheNFSTarget_accessPolicy
=== CONT  TestAccHPCCacheNFSTarget_accessPolicy
 --- PASS: TestAccHPCCacheNFSTarget_accessPolicy (2832.25s)
PASS
ok      github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm/internal/services/hpccache    2832.392s

[katbyte]

LGTM 👍

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!