Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r/codepipeline - add validations #18451

Merged

Conversation

DrFaust92
Copy link
Collaborator

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCodePipeline_'
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_disappears (75.33s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_WithNamespace (82.47s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_emptyStageArtifacts (86.13s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_multiregion_basic (91.90s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole (95.76s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_multiregion_Update (144.19s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_basic (162.54s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_tags (203.20s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCodePipeline_multiregion_ConvertSingleRegion (213.84s)

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 29, 2021 07:01
@ghost ghost added size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. provider Pertains to the provider itself, rather than any interaction with AWS. and removed size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Mar 29, 2021
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 added service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. and removed provider Pertains to the provider itself, rather than any interaction with AWS. labels Mar 29, 2021
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the r/codepipeline_pipeline_validations branch from 25d10bc to fa33be7 Compare May 27, 2021 19:59
@ghost ghost added size/XXL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels May 27, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. label May 27, 2021
@ghost ghost added size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. size/XXL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed size/XXL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels May 27, 2021
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 added service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. labels Jul 4, 2021
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the r/codepipeline_pipeline_validations branch from 1d36d44 to 4a14a73 Compare July 4, 2021 06:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Jul 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. label Jul 4, 2021
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 added the service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. label Jul 4, 2021
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the r/codepipeline_pipeline_validations branch from 06014a0 to eb8bbc8 Compare September 24, 2021 11:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Sep 24, 2021
@zhelding
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21306 has significantly refactored the AWS Provider codebase. As a result, most PRs opened prior to the refactor now have merge conflicts that must be resolved before proceeding.

Specifically, PR #21306 relocated the code for all AWS resources and data sources from a single aws directory to a large number of separate directories in internal/service, each corresponding to a particular AWS service. This separation of code has also allowed for us to simplify the names of underlying functions -- while still avoiding namespace collisions.

We recognize that many pull requests have been open for some time without yet being addressed by our maintainers. Therefore, we want to make it clear that resolving these conflicts in no way affects the prioritization of a particular pull request. Once a pull request has been prioritized for review, the necessary changes will be made by a maintainer -- either directly or in collaboration with the pull request author.

For a more complete description of this refactor, including examples of how old filepaths and function names correspond to their new counterparts: please refer to issue #20000.

For a quick guide on how to amend your pull request to resolve the merge conflicts resulting from this refactor and bring it in line with our new code patterns: please refer to our Service Package Refactor Pull Request Guide.

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the r/codepipeline_pipeline_validations branch from 80769b2 to e2132af Compare January 4, 2022 06:37
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. label Jan 4, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ewbankkit ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccCodePipeline_ PKG=codepipeline
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/codepipeline/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccCodePipeline_' -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_basic
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_emptyStageArtifacts
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_emptyStageArtifacts
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_tags
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_basic
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_update
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_update
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_withNamespace
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_withNamespace
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_withGitHubV1SourceAction
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_withGitHubV1SourceAction
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_basic
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_update
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_emptyStageArtifacts
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_tags
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_withGitHubV1SourceAction
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_basic
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_withNamespace
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_withNamespace (44.13s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_disappears (49.81s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_emptyStageArtifacts (51.42s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_deployWithServiceRole (53.63s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_basic (59.36s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_update (69.07s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_withGitHubV1SourceAction (71.37s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_basic (78.24s)
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion
    codepipeline_test.go:390: Step 3/4 error: Error running apply: exit status 1
        
        Error: region cannot be set for a single-region CodePipeline
        
          with aws_codepipeline.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 63, in resource "aws_codepipeline" "test":
          63: resource "aws_codepipeline" "test" {
        
--- FAIL: TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion (89.52s)
--- PASS: TestAccCodePipeline_tags (98.75s)
FAIL
FAIL	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/codepipeline	102.837s

Failure is unrelated to this change, it's also happening on main:

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion PKG=codepipeline
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/codepipeline/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion' -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion
=== PAUSE TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion
=== CONT  TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion
    codepipeline_test.go:390: Step 3/4 error: Error running apply: exit status 1
        
        Error: region cannot be set for a single-region CodePipeline
        
          with aws_codepipeline.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 63, in resource "aws_codepipeline" "test":
          63: resource "aws_codepipeline" "test" {
        
--- FAIL: TestAccCodePipeline_MultiRegion_convertSingleRegion (130.72s)
FAIL
FAIL	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/codepipeline	136.587s

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@DrFaust92 Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

@ewbankkit ewbankkit merged commit dbb4958 into hashicorp:main Jan 5, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.71.0 milestone Jan 5, 2022
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 deleted the r/codepipeline_pipeline_validations branch January 5, 2022 14:34
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2022

This functionality has been released in v3.71.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 30, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/codepipeline Issues and PRs that pertain to the codepipeline service. size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants