adds an event bus policy resource #16874

cohen990 · 2020-12-22T12:24:12Z

Community Note

Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Release note for CHANGELOG:

Adds support for resource policies on cloudwatch eventbridge

Output from acceptance testing:


==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=CloudwatchEventBusPolicy -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic (19.01s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	24.990s

cohen990 · 2020-12-22T12:25:26Z

Hi, I was hoping to get some guidance on why the acceptance test is failing. I can't figure out where the whitespace difference may have been introduced nor can I figure out where the plan is actually being run.

~~From what I can tell, I'm storing everything correctly into the state.~~

cohen990 · 2020-12-22T14:34:53Z

Managed to get the diff suppression working!

github-actions · 2021-01-13T12:43:55Z

Thank you for your contribution! 🚀

Please note that typically Go dependency changes are handled in this repository by dependabot or the maintainers. This is to prevent pull request merge conflicts and further delay reviews of contributions. Remove any changes to the go.mod or go.sum files and commit them into this pull request.

Additional details:

Check open pull requests with the dependencies label to view other dependency updates.
If this pull request includes an update the AWS Go SDK (or any other dependency) version, only updates submitted via dependabot will be merged. This pull request will need to remove these changes and will need to be rebased after the existing dependency update via dependabot has been merged for this pull request to be reviewed.
If this pull request is for supporting a new AWS service:
- Ensure the new AWS service changes are following the Contributing Guide section on new services, in particular that the dependency addition and initial provider support are in a separate pull request from other changes (e.g. new resources). Contributions not following this item will not be reviewed until the changes are split.
- If this pull request is already a separate pull request from the above item, you can ignore this message.

github-actions · 2021-01-13T12:43:58Z

Thank you for your contribution! 🚀

Please note that the CHANGELOG.md file contents are handled by the maintainers during merge. This is to prevent pull request merge conflicts, especially for contributions which may not be merged immediately. Please see the Contributing Guide for additional pull request review items.

Remove any changes to the CHANGELOG.md file and commit them in this pull request to prevent delays with reviewing and potentially merging this pull request.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-02T11:55:22Z

Thanks a lot for the contribution @cohen990 - This is the last feature to complete EventBridge feature parity with CloudFormation. I'll look into it early next week.

At a first glance, it looks straightforward enough, so might be able to finish triaging next week the latest

heitorlessa

Looks mostly good - missing tests on update/delete, and check on policy properties for safety update.

We also updated validateFunc since this PR was created so you can simply accept the suggestion as tests are broken now.

After these happy to send to prioritization so we can complete EventBridge feature coverage on TF

Thanks a lot for the hard work on this!

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:19:35Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy_test.go

+				Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc(
+					testAccCheckAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyExists(resourceName),
+				),
+			},


Could you add an extra step to test for updates?

e.g.

terraform-provider-aws/aws/resource_aws_iam_group_policy_test.go

Line 40 in 7247dd0

Config: testAccIAMGroupPolicyConfigUpdate(rInt),

testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfigUpdate added.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:21:31Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy_test.go

+		Steps: []resource.TestStep{
+			{
+				Config: testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfig(rstring),
+				Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc(


Could you check for properties in the policy to confirm they match key details like principal and statement sid?

e.g. resource.TestCheckResourceAttr(resourceName1, "principal", principal),

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/pull/16874/files?file-filters%5B%5D=.go#diff-23812e233d355579267c55e833a81e4aa3a286298ee1477b978cbcd22ec7ad0cR141

Checks all of it, so we're good here.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:33:02Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

+		return fmt.Errorf("Creating CloudWatch Events policy failed: %w", err)
+	}
+
+	d.SetId(eventBusName)


I might be wrong, but I'm on the fence about this not being a combination of eventBus + policy statement ID (unique), like in the event_permission resource.

I'd defer to core maintainers on this one

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:40:50Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

+	return output.Policy, nil
+}
+
+func resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyUpdate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error {


Could you create a test updating a policy?

testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfigUpdate added.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:41:10Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

+	return resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyRead(d, meta)
+}
+
+func resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyDelete(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error {


Could you create a test for deletion?

TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears added.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:41:47Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

+		return fmt.Errorf("Creating CloudWatch Events policy failed: %w", err)
+	}
+
+	d.SetId(eventBusName)


I'm on the fence of this not being a combination of bus name + statement Id - I suspect it's okay given you can have a single resource policy per bus, so I'll defer to core maintainers on that.

Considering the "aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy" resource supports multiple statements we think that making it unique for each event bus won't introduce limitations. Also this implementation appears to be consistent with the SDK/CLI, which don't model event bus permissions as independent resources.

I don't disagree. I don't just understand what the rationale was behind aws_cloudwatch_event_permission to create an unique ID back then: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/blob/fafcf78238182983aa8a5238c326f9049448aa70/aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_permission.go#L103-L102

The "aws_cloudwatch_event_permission" resource only defines one statement in the policy, and it's therefore identified by it. The resource "aws_cloudwatch_event_policy" defines the complete policy for the event bus (possibly with multiple statements) and it's intended to be unique for each event bus.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:42:45Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy_test.go

+				Config: testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfig(rstring),
+				Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc(
+					testAccCheckAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyExists(resourceName),
+				),


Could you check for policy properties like statement_id and principal? e.g. check whether policy matches what's being created

This now does a deep diff from TF state and what's available in the bus. It does the job and run through the entire logic IMHO and state.

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/pull/16874/files?file-filters%5B%5D=.go#diff-23812e233d355579267c55e833a81e4aa3a286298ee1477b978cbcd22ec7ad0cR141

Deferring to Hashicorp core team if they want to be nitpick and check whether X key has changed.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-11T16:44:15Z

website/docs/r/cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.html.markdown

+
+```hcl
+resource "aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy" "test" {
+  policy         = data.aws_iam_policy_document.access.json


Could you add this sample policy as part of the example to improve docs experience?

docs added with multiple examples. LGTM

update according to suggestion Co-authored-by: Heitor Lessa <[email protected]>

heitorlessa · 2021-06-15T16:49:04Z

Yes, that’s correct.

…

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 18:11, Francesco Fucile ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go <#16874 (comment)> : > + + log.Printf("[DEBUG] Update CloudWatch EventBus policy: %s", input) + _, err := conn.PutPermission(&input) + if isAWSErr(err, events.ErrCodeResourceNotFoundException, "") { + log.Printf("[WARN] CloudWatch EventBus %q not found, removing from state", d.Id()) + d.SetId("") + return nil + } + if err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("error updating policy for CloudWatch EventBus (%s): %w", d.Id(), err) + } + + return resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyRead(d, meta) +} + +func resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyDelete(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error { Are you referring to a test for "resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyDelete"? Something like deleting the policy and verifying it doesn't exist anymore using the SDK? — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#16874 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZPQBANDMT6LJKXSNUDXSDTS53THANCNFSM4VFSETCA> .

heitorlessa · 2021-06-17T15:52:16Z

Thanks for the comments, Francesco! I'll have a second look tomorrow, especially the deletion test.

…

On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 15:16, Francesco Fucile ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go <#16874 (comment)> : > + + eventBusName := d.Get("event_bus_name").(string) + policy := d.Get("policy").(string) + + input := events.PutPermissionInput{ + EventBusName: aws.String(eventBusName), + Policy: aws.String(policy), + } + + log.Printf("[DEBUG] Creating CloudWatch Events policy: %s", input) + _, err := conn.PutPermission(&input) + if err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("Creating CloudWatch Events policy failed: %w", err) + } + + d.SetId(eventBusName) Considering the "aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy" resource supports multiple statements we think that making it unique for each event bus won't introduce limitations. Also this implementation appears to be consistent with the SDK/CLI, which don't model event bus permissions as independent resources. — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#16874 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZPQBCKJ2WBZJUFLKXWXR3TTHYT5ANCNFSM4VFSETCA> .

…s. Fix linting for TF configuration defined in tests. Add "attributes reference" paragraph in resource docs.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-22T10:43:41Z

Not that I’m aware no. I’ve tried looking for references to the Organization’s resource test where we use an extra data caller identity which can be tested using TestResourceAttrPair, but it wouldn’t in this case. My best guess would be to create a function to JSON decode and assert whether a given key has the expected value - this would be useful to test the Update logic that isn’t tested atm, for example.

…

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 12:34, Francesco Fucile ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy_test.go <#16874 (comment)> : > + "github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/resource" + "github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/terraform" +) + +func TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic(t *testing.T) { + resourceName := "aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.test" + rstring := acctest.RandString(5) + + resource.ParallelTest(t, resource.TestCase{ + PreCheck: func() { testAccPreCheck(t) }, + Providers: testAccProviders, + CheckDestroy: testAccCheckAWSCloudWatchEventBusDestroy, + Steps: []resource.TestStep{ + { + Config: testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfig(rstring), + Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc( The problem with this check is that we are setting the whole policy JSON text as a field in the "event_bus_policy" resource configuration. We are therefore not able to check fields individually, we can just compare the JSON document in the state with a reference. Since this JSON is generated at runtime we are not able to set such reference as a parameter for the test function. We found a similar scenario for the "aws_iam_role <https://github.com/Cazoo-uk/terraform-provider-aws/blob/42c30754145d2a5a1bfb2a3eb5e765a5e9caa782/aws/data_source_aws_iam_role_test.go#L70>". In this case the tests make use of a data source for re-importing the configuration of the generated resource into the state and compare its fields with the ones of the previously generated resource. Implementing a solution like this would require us to implement the "event_bus_policy" data source. Is there a different way to handle this case? — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#16874 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZPQBBBLIPGUTMOLQ5NA6DTTB45FANCNFSM4VFSETCA> .

Extend tests for the "aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy" resource as suggested from the Terraform maintainers.

cohen990 · 2021-06-22T14:01:59Z

@heitorlessa this should be ready for another review :)

heitorlessa

LGTM - Hashicorp core team might want to check whether it needs a attribute check on update test or whether the current deep value check of what's in TF state vs what's available in the Cloud suffice.

Sending to Hashicorp folks to prioritize it ;) Thanks a lot for those changes @cohen990 !

Latest test results

make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic (51.69s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears (146.29s)
PASS
ok      github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws       149.018s

heitorlessa · 2021-06-22T15:50:08Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

+	return resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyRead(d, meta)
+}
+
+func resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyDelete(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error {


TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears added.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-22T16:14:45Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy_test.go

+				Config: testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfig(rstring),
+				Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc(
+					testAccCheckAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyExists(resourceName),
+				),


This now does a deep diff from TF state and what's available in the bus. It does the job and run through the entire logic IMHO and state.

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/pull/16874/files?file-filters%5B%5D=.go#diff-23812e233d355579267c55e833a81e4aa3a286298ee1477b978cbcd22ec7ad0cR141

Deferring to Hashicorp core team if they want to be nitpick and check whether X key has changed.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-22T16:15:08Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy_test.go

+				Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc(
+					testAccCheckAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyExists(resourceName),
+				),
+			},


testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfigUpdate added.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-22T16:16:20Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy_test.go

+		Steps: []resource.TestStep{
+			{
+				Config: testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfig(rstring),
+				Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc(


https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/pull/16874/files?file-filters%5B%5D=.go#diff-23812e233d355579267c55e833a81e4aa3a286298ee1477b978cbcd22ec7ad0cR141

Checks all of it, so we're good here.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-22T16:17:03Z

aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

+	return output.Policy, nil
+}
+
+func resourceAwsCloudWatchEventBusPolicyUpdate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error {


testAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicyConfigUpdate added.

heitorlessa · 2021-06-22T16:22:44Z

Actually, @cohen990, it seems that the changelog vanished in the last merge - Could you re-add it? If it wasn't there in the first place and I dreamed it :D, here's what the file should look like so CI is happy about it.

File: ./changelog/16874.txt

Content: triple backsticks with release-note:new-resource as the source language for highlighting.

aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy

ewbankkit

LGTM 🚀.

Commercial

% make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_ -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic (25.64s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears (133.16s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	136.188s

GovCloud

% make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_ -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_basic (35.24s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudwatchEventBusPolicy_disappears (138.06s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	141.106s

Add CHANGELOG entry for #16874

github-actions · 2021-06-24T22:54:47Z

This functionality has been released in v3.47.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

github-actions · 2021-07-25T02:07:40Z

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

cohen990 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 22, 2020 12:24

ghost added size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. provider Pertains to the provider itself, rather than any interaction with AWS. service/cloudwatchevents tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. labels Dec 22, 2020

github-actions bot added the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Dec 22, 2020

ghost added size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. and removed size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Dec 22, 2020

cohen990 changed the title ~~[WIP] adds an event bus policy resource~~ adds an event bus policy resource Dec 23, 2020

ghost added size/XXL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Jan 13, 2021

ghost added size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed size/XXL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Jan 13, 2021

Base automatically changed from master to main January 23, 2021 01:00

bflad added new-resource Introduces a new resource. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Mar 4, 2021

heitorlessa self-assigned this Jun 2, 2021

heitorlessa suggested changes Jun 11, 2021

View reviewed changes

Dan Cohen added 2 commits June 13, 2021 13:53

implement the event bus policy resource

417fa7e

wip

77d2d67

Dan Cohen and others added 3 commits June 13, 2021 13:53

Update aws/resource_aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy.go

d03d521

update according to suggestion Co-authored-by: Heitor Lessa <[email protected]>

Add test for AWSCloudWatchEventBusPolicy_Disappears

80a7465

Change order of test execution in AWSCloudWatchEventBusPolicy

42c3075

nayoa and others added 7 commits June 16, 2021 15:03

Improve cloudwatch_event_bus_policy docs with practical examples

33b32a9

chek policy consistency on "basic" test.

f768a0f

polish "basic" test.

9b35502

add test for "update".

d2a7bb3

merge "update" test with "basic" test.

d3e9ec0

ducoment example for policy with multiple statements.

31730bf

rename "eventBusPolicyResourcePolicyDocument".

9800bb0

francesco-fucile added 3 commits June 17, 2021 18:42

Add missing error checks to tests. Enforce consistency for tests name…

e05b408

…s. Fix linting for TF configuration defined in tests. Add "attributes reference" paragraph in resource docs.

fix typo in documentation.

37d6933

Fix documentation examples.

01f604c

Merge pull request #73 from Cazoo-uk/event_bus_resource_policy_tests

77ce67f

Extend tests for the "aws_cloudwatch_event_bus_policy" resource as suggested from the Terraform maintainers.

heitorlessa approved these changes Jun 22, 2021

View reviewed changes

ewbankkit approved these changes Jun 22, 2021

View reviewed changes

ewbankkit merged commit 13bbcc8 into hashicorp:main Jun 22, 2021

github-actions bot added this to the v3.47.0 milestone Jun 22, 2021

ewbankkit added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2021

Add CHANGELOG entry for #16874.

72c603f

ewbankkit mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2021

Add CHANGELOG entry for #16874 #19925

Merged

ewbankkit added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2021

Merge pull request #19925 from hashicorp/pr-16874-changelog

d19c19b

Add CHANGELOG entry for #16874

github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 25, 2021

cohen990 deleted the f-event_bus_resource_policy branch October 3, 2021 21:06

adds an event bus policy resource #16874

adds an event bus policy resource #16874

Conversation

cohen990 commented Dec 22, 2020 • edited Loading

Community Note

cohen990 commented Dec 22, 2020 • edited Loading

cohen990 commented Dec 22, 2020

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2021

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2021

heitorlessa commented Jun 2, 2021

heitorlessa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

heitorlessa commented Jun 15, 2021 via email

heitorlessa commented Jun 17, 2021 via email

heitorlessa commented Jun 22, 2021 via email

cohen990 commented Jun 22, 2021

heitorlessa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

heitorlessa commented Jun 22, 2021 • edited Loading

ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Commercial

GovCloud

github-actions bot commented Jun 24, 2021

github-actions bot commented Jul 25, 2021

cohen990 commented Dec 22, 2020 •

edited

Loading

cohen990 commented Dec 22, 2020 •

edited

Loading

heitorlessa commented Jun 22, 2021 •

edited

Loading