RemoteAdministrationEndpoint attribute for aws_fsx_windows_file_system

[ghost]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

FSx has two network interfaces attached to it. One is used by clients by using the DNS Name attribute and the other is used for remote PowerShell connections.

Currently, only the DNS name is an attribute supported by the aws_fsx_windows_file_system resource. I would like to have the RemoteAdministrationEndpoint (Windows Remote PowerShell Endpoint) also available as an attribute.

New or Affected Resource(s)

• aws_fsx_windows_file_system

Potential Terraform Configuration

Addition of a remote_admin_endpoint attribute to the resource which can be used to retrieve the RemoteAdministrationEndpoint. This could then be referenced as

output "my_fsx_admin_endpoint" {
  value = aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_fsx.remote_admin_endpoint
}

References

• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/remote-pwrshell.html#using-rps
• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/reference/fsx/describe-file-systems.html

[DrFaust92]

addressed in #12676

[bflad]

This has been released in version 3.0.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks!

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!