Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with DataFactory/IntegrationRuntimes / API Version 2018-06-01 #661

Open
1 task done
ms-henglu opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Comments

@ms-henglu
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Service Used

DataFactory

API Versions Used

2018-06-01

Description

There're two kinds of integration runtime resources defined in the swagger:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/datafactory/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataFactory/stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/IntegrationRuntime.json#L53
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/datafactory/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataFactory/stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/IntegrationRuntime.json#L626

But only the base type is generated.

References

https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/datafactory/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataFactory/stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/IntegrationRuntime.json#L53
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/datafactory/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataFactory/stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/IntegrationRuntime.json#L626

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

@ms-henglu is this a duplicate of, or in addition to #642?

@ms-henglu
Copy link
Author

I think they're different, the #642 seems to be a swagger issue, but not this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants