Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSET9 does not mention jailbroken iOS #2406

Open
Anonymous941 opened this issue Nov 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

MSET9 does not mention jailbroken iOS #2406

Anonymous941 opened this issue Nov 26, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Anonymous941
Copy link

Pages with issue(s)

Installing boot9strap (MSET9)

Description of the issue(s)

This page states:

This method requires a computer running Windows, Linux, or macOS. ChromeOS and Android devices have an app that is currently not covered here. iOS devices are not supported. If you do not have access to a computer, you will need to use an alternate exploit.

However, jailbroken iOS has been supported for a while in the PR zoogie/MSET9#18

@lilyuwuu
Copy link
Member

someone pointed out in the source issue - shouldn't basically anyone with a jailbroken ios device have access to a computer of smoe sort?

More critically we're currently playing around with the idea of making a landing page for MSET9 and iOS kind of throws a wrench into that
maybe a 'special cases' section for OSes/cases not covered by the table?
reference:
image

@Anonymous941
Copy link
Author

Anonymous941 commented Nov 26, 2023

someone pointed out in the source issue - shouldn't basically anyone with a jailbroken ios device have access to a computer of smoe sort?

Probably, but it's also possible that they used jailbreak.me, or borrowed a computer? I agree it's unlikely, but shouldn't it at least be mentioned?

@lifehackerhansol
Copy link
Contributor

It's unlikely we'll have a proper guide writeup for iOS at this time.

Indeed, we could mention it's supported. The currently written warning can be slightly misleading, since it is supported, just, this page isn't suited for it. It can be clarified in #2402.

I'd be interested to see someone attempt writing it up on the wiki.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants