Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalized parking baseline for each unique project type #1126

Closed
1 task done
SMR9220 opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed
1 task done

Generalized parking baseline for each unique project type #1126

SMR9220 opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 10 comments

Comments

@SMR9220
Copy link
Member

SMR9220 commented Apr 25, 2022

Overview

We need to address the concern the users raised about Citywide Parking Baseline so that the calculations reflect or take account into the special/older areas/zones that specific projects locate at.

User concern summary

How can a generalized parking baseline on page 3 determine the point target for a specific project? For example, a project locates at old redevelopment plan areas (i.e. there are different downtown zones - mentioned by participant) and those zones have different requirements.

Action Items

  • add to stakeholder meeting to discuss what happens if the citywide baseline being used by the calculator is higher than the community parking requirements

Resources/Instructions

Proposed text

Your development may be in an area that has a lower requirement than the provided baseline, so the calculator does not penalize you. If your development is in an area that has a higher requirement than the provided baseline (contact [whomever], note that in the notes field on the first page)

Placement of text

Add the message (via tooltip for Citywide Parking Baseline on page 3)

image

@SMR9220

This comment was marked as outdated.

@SMR9220 SMR9220 changed the title User is concerned with generalized parking baseline for each unique project type. Generalized parking baseline for each unique project type. Apr 28, 2022
@SMR9220 SMR9220 added role: front-end Front End Developer role: back-end Node/Express Development Task needs clarification decision Make a decision priority: SHOULD HAVE labels Apr 30, 2022
@Biuwa
Copy link
Member

Biuwa commented May 16, 2022

Is this stakeholders' or team's decision to make @SMR9220?

@SMR9220
Copy link
Member Author

SMR9220 commented May 17, 2022

Is this stakeholders' or team's decision to make @SMR9220?

Teams decision. The wording and/or potential solutions has yet to be determined.

@ExperimentsInHonesty
Copy link
Member

@Jane4925 I rewrote the issue. Some items are missing, please review and improve so that we can prioritize this

@Biuwa
Copy link
Member

Biuwa commented Nov 17, 2022

@Jane4925 Reminder to please review this issue.

@Biuwa
Copy link
Member

Biuwa commented Jan 15, 2023

@Jane4925 please review this issue

@Biuwa
Copy link
Member

Biuwa commented Jan 15, 2023

@Jane4925
Copy link
Member

My recollection is that we talked about this with stakeholder before, and they weren't planning on revising the Ordinance again back then.

@Biuwa
Copy link
Member

Biuwa commented Jan 21, 2023

@Biuwa
Copy link
Member

Biuwa commented Feb 8, 2023

2023-02-07 STAKEHOLDERS MEETING NOTES:
Emily: Less likely to run into this issue, becoming less of a potential problem. Ways to resolve:

  1. There are relief mechanisms in the policy/ordinance.
  2. Write guidance in the implementation guide for the TDM ordinance.

No FAQ update is expected at this time. Hack for LA will bring it back to Emily and Xander if it comes up in user testing.

@mojimoh mojimoh changed the title Generalized parking baseline for each unique project type. Generalized parking baseline for each unique project type Feb 8, 2023
@Biuwa Biuwa closed this as completed Feb 9, 2023
@Biuwa Biuwa reopened this Feb 9, 2023
@Biuwa Biuwa closed this as completed Feb 9, 2023
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty moved this to On Dev - not yet pushed to Prod in P: TDM: project board Jun 11, 2024
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added the pbv: research all issue for researcher roles label Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Released
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants