-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there any plan to developing a C++ version? #15
Comments
No, I don't have any plan to do. I wonder why you need C++ version. Since it generates a reverse-proxy, it does not restrict the language in which you implement your gRPC server. They only benefit which comes to my mind is that C++ version would be able to support arbitrary message without rebuilding the proxy because C++ has a support of DynamicMessage. What do you think? |
The question seems to be resolved. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/grpc-io/JnjCYGPMUms/2TSnRPm7E7cJ |
Hi All, Is there any C/C++ api gateway developed as on today if not are there any examples I can refer to understand how I can link this reverse-proxy with my gRPC server written in C++ |
AFAIK, no.
It is probably possible to link the generated go code with C++ server since CGO can generate a shared library. |
This is how grpc-gateway usually works. So you don't need dive into the complicated world of error handlings, concurrency and garbage collection in CGO. With CGO, in theory it is still possible to run the reverse-proxy server in the same process as the gRPC server. But usually it is not very beneficial. |
Thank you so much @yugui 😃 |
add GetAssetIssueByAccount.
Is there any plan to develop a C++ version? :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: