Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Insufficiently specific #33

Open
ColinScott opened this issue Aug 7, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Insufficiently specific #33

ColinScott opened this issue Aug 7, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@ColinScott
Copy link

This library is great for representing that there is no thing. But what if we need to be more specific about what we do not have? This library needs NoOne, NoChance, NoIdea etc.
@dsyme
Copy link

dsyme commented Aug 10, 2015

And don't forget NoHope, NoClue, NoWorries, NoProblem.

@TWith2Sugars
Copy link

NoWay

@jcmrva
Copy link

jcmrva commented Jul 28, 2021 •
edited
Loading

A generic version would be even better: No<Thing>

I see there's already an issue for that #24

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@ColinScott @TWith2Sugars @dsyme @jcmrva