You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is very similar to the filter section in HackRF One where we have two SP3T switches that provide three paths: high-pass, low-pass, and band-pass. The band-pass path could be straight-through without an actual filter.
We could use off-the-shelf filters as in HackRF, or we could design lumped element filters. We might consider chaining two or more filters in order to achieve a sharper cut-off.
Potentially we could add more paths with tighter filters, increasing the ability to filter out additional mixer products and out-of-band blocker signals, but three paths is our minimum requirement.
A HackRF-like design would be a good place to start.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As seen to the right of the RFFC5072 mixers in the block diagram: https://github.com/greatscottgadgets/lab-notes/tree/main/project-reports/2023-06-02-urti-progress-report#mainboard-block-diagram
This is very similar to the filter section in HackRF One where we have two SP3T switches that provide three paths: high-pass, low-pass, and band-pass. The band-pass path could be straight-through without an actual filter.
We could use off-the-shelf filters as in HackRF, or we could design lumped element filters. We might consider chaining two or more filters in order to achieve a sharper cut-off.
Potentially we could add more paths with tighter filters, increasing the ability to filter out additional mixer products and out-of-band blocker signals, but three paths is our minimum requirement.
A HackRF-like design would be a good place to start.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: