-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't render high(local) administrative borders on coastlines #712
Comments
(I was about to file a new issue, but found this old one.) This is particularly noticeable in Denmark, where adminlevel 4 and/or 7 boundaries are rendered around every fjord and island — I confused them for footpaths last weekend! I think this is very easy to do along a coastline, where it's very reasonable to expect a long-distance footpath. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/55.7230/12.0537 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.83414/12.05230 (More generally, the administrative borders are very prominent, yet sub-national borders probably aren't relevant to most map users. How about just making them as thin as possible?) |
Are you willing to make some code implementing this change? |
This is an instance of #3102 (which was quite a heated discussion). This is likely not trivial to accomplish. |
Oh wow, I don't really want to open a can of worms here. I now see #1248, which I think is a better description of the issue I had confusing admin borders with paths. |
If I remember, the main problem were proposed changes to the tagging borders, not the rendering. If this one would not mean such changes, it wouldn't be hard to deploy it. |
There are two types of tagging: tagging the relation that includes all boundary lines of an admin area, of tagging the boundary lines themselves. We render based on the first approach (relation), and people have a problem with rendering based on the second approach (boundary lines). However, whether a boundary is maritime or not is stored in the individual boundary lines, so if we render based on the relation, we have no access to that. |
Would it be possible to use some comp-op "majik", as with the admin boundaries, to hide the dashed borders on the coastline? Eg as in #1107 by @matthijsmelissen |
If #4092 is merged we would have ways for the coastlines in the database, which might make it easier to solve this issue for admin boundaries with precisely follow the coastline |
Don't render adminlevel 8 boundaries if the coincede with coastlines.
See also https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2670
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: