Render access= on highway=pedestrian?

[osmuser63783]

Expected behavior

Show highway=pedestrian access=no with a pattern similar to the one used for other streets with access=no

Actual behavior

No rendering of access= on highway=pedestrian. I would be curious if this is a deliberate decision - as it it seems inconsistent with the rendering of access restrictions in other highway types.

I noticed this when looking at a pedestrian bridge that had been closed and marked with access=no (it has since reopened). I was surprised to see that it was tagged access=no but did not "look closed" on the map.

Searching Overpass for examples of access=no on highway=pedestrian (4,395 cases worldwide) finds more examples of this e.g. a pedestrian street being closed (to pedestrians) due to roadworks for a couple of months. It also shows examples of verbose access tagging, e.g. highway=pedestrian access=no foot=yes bicycle=yes motor_vehicle=no, so rendering access on pedestrian without taking into account foot (i.e. solving #214) would have the side effect of showing these on the map. Not sure if that would be considered a good or a bad thing, but I wanted to flag it.

Screenshots with links illustrating the problem

This is a screenshot of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5049168 before I removed access=no (because the bridge has now reopened).

[imagico]

Yes, this is one of the things we discussed as potential follow-up changes to #4952. With the current system of showing only access=* and not the transport mode specific access tags showing access=no without interpreting foot=* would often be confusing. But with #4952 this could definitely be of value.

[dch0ph]

The straightforward fix would be to add rendering of restricted and no access marking for highway=pedestrian based on tag interpretation for footways already added in #4952 .

The only decision would be the colour of access marking to provide sufficient contrast with the grey colour of highway=pedestrian. I would suggest simply white.

A PR could include #5024 , since the logic is the same?