You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is very confusing the thing that village names and suburb names are displayed in the same way (I know that in the 13rd and 12th levels of zoom the suburb names are slightly bigger, but it is very hard to notice).
Actual behavior
I'd suggest to change just a little bit the font or the color of the text.
Screenshots with links illustrating the problem
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As mentioned, suburbs are rendered with greater priority and at lower zoom levels in bigger font and with greater prominence than Villages. I personally find this perplexing so came here to file a bug on that particular behavior. Villages are higher in hierarchy than Suburbs.
Comparison of Rendering Differences between Suburbs and Villages
Attribute
Suburb
Village
Notes
Initial Zoom
>= 12
>= 12
Both start rendering at zoom level 12 and stop at < 17
Initial Text Size
11
10
Suburb text starts slightly larger
Initial Text Wrap Width
55
50
Suburb text has a larger initial wrap width
Initial Text Line Spacing
-0.55
-0.50
Minor difference in line spacing
Initial Text Margin
7.7
7.0
Suburb text has a slightly larger margin
Zoom Level Modifiers
Zoom Level
Suburb Text Size
Village Text Size
Notes
>= 13
12
11
Both increase, but Suburb remains larger
>= 14
14
13
Both change text fill to lighter color; Suburb remains larger
>= 15
14
14
Village catches up in text size
>= 16
15
15
Both are now the same size; Suburb started larger but ends the same
Expected behavior
It is very confusing the thing that village names and suburb names are displayed in the same way (I know that in the 13rd and 12th levels of zoom the suburb names are slightly bigger, but it is very hard to notice).
Actual behavior
I'd suggest to change just a little bit the font or the color of the text.
Screenshots with links illustrating the problem
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: