-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 308
up receiving limit for individuals #2570
Comments
Doesn't that work against the idea of not giving someone undue influence over someone else on Gittip? What benefit is there to removing anonymity? |
@seanlinsley Yeah, my thinking is that Gittip is evolving. I think we want to increase our emphasis on the Teams/Payroll feature. I should probably do a Medium post about this. |
@seanlinsley I see what you are saying, but this is a requirement I need to satisfy my boss. I love Gittip and want to continue to use the platform to distribute funds to those who deserve to get paid what they are worth. $400 a month, is too low for some of the folks I work with. @whit537 I am happy to jump on a live hangout and/or contribute to the Medium post. |
@jdorfman I know you've advocated for non-anonymous giving in the past (#236), so I guess that's not going to be an issue for you here. Would you rather see this or #2571? What do your receivers want? Do they want you to set the amount they're each receiving, or do they want to each set it themselves from an overall budget that you'd set? |
I'm upping this to ★★★. If you'd rather see #2571 instead, let us know! |
@whit537 @seanlinsley Ideally I just want to be able to give anyone upto $1,000 a week. In terms of fraud, I think one way to mitigate this is to have an opt-in process to start. |
@seanlinsley Since we already allow gifts up to $1,000 w/o whitelisting, do we really need to enforce whitelisting here? A fraudster could already potentially move up to $1,000 at a time through our system if they cared to try. I think we shouldn't worry about whitelisting on the giver side. I think we should focus on the opt-in experience on the receiver side. Maybe we need a "Receiving" page that's parallel to the "Giving" page we have now? We could move the charts there to represent a receiver's anonymous tips, and we could also show potential and actual non-anonymous payments there as well. Eh? |
Data point re: fraud. We received this sketchy email on support a while ago:
|
Dropping to ★★☆ since we can handle manually as a workaround. |
Closing, since with teams the limit is $1000 per week (yes, I just checked). |
@jdorfman from @MaxCDN wants to start giving > $100/wk to individuals. We upped the receiving limit for groups in #1378. What would it look like to up the limit for individuals?
It sounds like @jdorfman's use case is starting to get into more of a payroll situation, where he's giving to someone who's doing a fair bit of work on @MaxCDN's open-source projects. In the past we've said that employment-type relationships are out of scope for Gittip, but now we actually have a payroll-like feature: Teams (cf. #2569). One possibility could be to use the existing Teams/Payroll feature with the MaxCDN Gittip account.
If we did want to up the receiving limit for individuals, I think we should do something like:
Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: