Team take not included in total received.

[johana-star]

On profile pages members of gittip have a total like:
Strand receives: $3.25 per week.

However this number underreports the amount someone receives when some of their contributions come from teams. The screenshot below shows my team contribution as an anonymous transaction at the bottom of the list.

I expect the total a member receives listed on their profile page to include funds from teams.

[cakey]

+1

[chadwhitacre]

@ceboudreaux Didn't you ticket this already?

[ceboudreaux]

Yes, closing in favor of #1126 and #1127

[chadwhitacre]

Reopening. #1126 is about the entry in the history page; #1127 is about whether givers have a credit card attached. Including team takes in receiving deserves it's own ticket.

[chadwhitacre]

+1 from @helmo on #2049:

As a team member on gittip you start out getting $0.01 per week.

However after two weeks the top right corner of my gittip pages still is say "Receiving: $0.00/wk".
While on the team's history tab I can see that a cent has been debited from the balance. And on my personal history page I can see the cent being credited.

Rounding error?

[edit] just the "Receiving: $0.00/wk" is bad ... balance seems OK.

[duckinator]

+1

[rummik]

Would be really handy to have this :P +1 from me as well

I'd do it, but I'm way too nervous about touching anything that changes the DB right now

Edit: I'm actually -0 on this. I think there should be a total receiving, but I think the number on profiles should be the amount being gifted to a user

[sim6]

As @seanlinsley says at #2203, we need a distinction between money given directly by others, and money requested as a member of a team. How can we can do that?

[ESWAT]

+1.

As for distinction between team take and direct gifts, I don’t believe we need to make this distinction in the header after #2203 is on prod, but it would be nice to have it in the History page.

Splitting the transaction to 'from others' - I’m not a fan of the 'from someone' wording personally - and 'from team' would be the simplest solution.

[rummik]

Seems like we could help explain this by some wording changes. So, like, instead of 'Person receives $X on Gittip', we could say, 'Person is gifted $X on Gittip', so there's better separation between gifts from users and team takes.

[rummik]

(I'm actually changing to -0 on this)

[sim6]

@ESWAT please, take a look at #1126 and #2173