You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we don't perform any kind of validation in the configuration that is passed to create a new Backoff object.
Passing a minBackoff of zero means that both nextDelayMin and nextDelayMax will be set to zero, meaning that NextDelay is also always zero and that we'll never wait for a meaningful amount of time.
At the very least we can document this kind of behavior, but I believe that adding some rudimentary validation of the configuration passed shouldn't be too much overhead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we don't perform any kind of validation in the configuration that is passed to create a new Backoff object.
Passing a minBackoff of zero means that both nextDelayMin and nextDelayMax will be set to zero, meaning that NextDelay is also always zero and that we'll never wait for a meaningful amount of time.
At the very least we can document this kind of behavior, but I believe that adding some rudimentary validation of the configuration passed shouldn't be too much overhead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: