-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: allow no project in client methods using storage emulator #703
Conversation
…emove client side validation
google/cloud/storage/client.py
Outdated
if project is None: | ||
raise ValueError("Client project not set: pass an explicit project.") | ||
# Use no project if STORAGE_EMULATOR_HOST is set | ||
if _get_storage_host().find("storage.googleapis.com") < 0: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Three points to make here:
I think if "storage.googleapis.com" in _get_storage_host()
is a better idiom than using find().
We should avoid hardcoding strings like "storage.googleapis.com" when possible. Perhaps we should have a constant, and/or a helper function that answers the question consistently and globally of whether we are using the emulator?
Is there no way to avoid needing the client to be aware of the emulator at all? Perhaps it's the emulator that needs to change here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review! Updated according to your comments.
The user ask is to be able to run the same code against a storage emulator as well as the live server (without writing extra conditions or wrappers), often seen in testing.
client.create_bucket()
and client.list_buckets()
are the only 2 library methods that explicitly expect a project
. I think it makes sense to allow these 2 methods to detect the emulator and use a fake project marker.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM; aside from the comments but I might just be missing something there.
When using a storage emulator, allow no project/fake project marker in
client.create_bucket()
andclient.list_buckets()
Alongside, this removes client-side validation and falls back to API validations. In this case, if a project is not set, instead of raising a
ValueError
in the client, the GCS server will return aBadRequest
with messageRequired parameter: project
Fixes #699