Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: allow files in directories to be downloaded onto local machine #2199

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
May 21, 2024

Conversation

hochoy
Copy link
Contributor

@hochoy hochoy commented May 18, 2023

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) (n/a)

Fixes #2200 🦕

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-storage API. labels May 18, 2023
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 18, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 18, 2023
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. labels May 18, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 18, 2023
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label May 18, 2023
@hochoy hochoy marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2023 20:20
@hochoy hochoy requested review from a team as code owners May 18, 2023 20:20
@hochoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

hochoy commented May 18, 2023

@ddelgrosso1 , I tried running samples-test and system-test but based on the logs, it appears those require an active project in order to do an e2e/live test against real GCP infrastructure.

Is that accurate?
How expensive is that if I run it on my own project? Should I be triggering it here in the repo instead (and leverage your repo's cloudbuild/github actions infra)?

@hochoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

hochoy commented May 18, 2023

Also, I would like to add a test to check that the files are truly downloaded into the local machine or memory.
Would you recommend I give that a shot? Or is that overkill?

src/transfer-manager.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

@ddelgrosso1 , I tried running samples-test and system-test but based on the logs, it appears those require an active project in order to do an e2e/live test against real GCP infrastructure.

Is that accurate? How expensive is that if I run it on my own project? Should I be triggering it here in the repo instead (and leverage your repo's cloudbuild/github actions infra)?

That is accurate. I wouldn't worry about running these on your own, they get run in the CI pipeline each time a commit is pushed. However, unit tests should work without issue locally.

Also, I would like to add a test to check that the files are truly downloaded into the local machine or memory. Would you recommend I give that a shot? Or is that overkill?

If you feel up to it a unit test can probably be created to test this. I can look to see if we have any similar tests elsewhere that might serve as a guide.

One thing I will do is to cleanup the the JS Docs to make it abundantly clear that not supplying a prefix will result in the files downloaded to memory.

src/file.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xs Pull request size is extra small. and removed size: s Pull request size is small. labels May 28, 2023
src/file.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. and removed size: xs Pull request size is extra small. labels May 29, 2023
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: m Pull request size is medium. and removed size: s Pull request size is small. labels May 29, 2023
test/file.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/file.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-storage API. size: m Pull request size is medium.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

transferManager.downloadManyFiles not writing files locally
5 participants