Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document some AssertJ equivalents, especially for Iterable assertions #681

Open
cpovirk opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
P3 not scheduled type=documentation Documentation that is other than for an API type=enhancement Make an existing feature better

Comments

@cpovirk
Copy link
Member

cpovirk commented Apr 20, 2020

AssertJ's AbstractIterableAssert is large. We don't have an equivalent to every last assertion (and this is sometimes intentional), but for cases in which we do have an equivalent, we could help prospective users / migrating users / users with an AssertJ background by providing a mapping between the two.

A lot of advanced assertions would use Fuzzy Truth. For example, AssertJ assertions that use areAtLeastOne(condition) and extractingResultOf(method) would often use comparingElementsUsing.

@cpovirk cpovirk added type=documentation Documentation that is other than for an API P3 not scheduled labels Apr 20, 2020
@raghsriniv raghsriniv added the type=enhancement Make an existing feature better label Apr 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P3 not scheduled type=documentation Documentation that is other than for an API type=enhancement Make an existing feature better
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants