New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

A better way to calculate object area #7

Open

jamiechoi1995 opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 0 comments

jamiechoi1995 commented Oct 15, 2018

According to your paper, objects that smaller than 2% will be ignored.

sg2im/sg2im/data/coco.py

Line 152 in 2638373

_, _, w, h = object_data['bbox']

but this code only consider the width and height,
and this could not reflect the true area of an object,

For example, this is a "clothes" stuff, and most of the area is blank. (Original image: http://cocodataset.org/#explore?id=245764)

the area calculated by w and h is 10692,
but if you use codes like `np.sum(mask)', you get a more accurate area of 1115.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment