Bumping minimum jre to 11 #1743
Replies: 5 comments
-
Definitely JDK 17 should be considered yes, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@sameb I'd opt for 17 for future versions |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
17 is an interesting question, it's just not the one I'm ready to ask about. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I was working with the idea that JDK 11 is EOL in September this year :) I understand but seems a bit of a waste of effort? It's really about being able to build native Java applications without a damn fat-jar and using the modular pathways instead of the "classpath" ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
FYI, the minimum is now bumped to Java 11 (as of c58bc33). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi folks,
As of c58bc33, Guice will require Java 11 (up from Java 8). This will apply to all future releases (past 7.0.0).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions