-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide binaries and releases #21
Comments
Running into the same issue here :/ |
@DylanMeeus the way we solved this was running |
Thanks @gssbzn, I'll give that a try! |
Would a Docker image suffice? There's already a Dockerfile that should always build, and it should be relatively easy to release Docker images. |
@RJPercival it would be a start for sure, our ci doesn't have the best docker support but we are working on it. |
They should be happy to tag a release; the v1 milestone is complete so I think it's ready for a v1.0.0 tag. I'm not so sure about goreleaser; they'll have to chime in there. |
with go1.16 I think this can be closed as in theory now there's an option to not alter the the go.mod file, I still need to test this on our CI env as we are still adding 1.16 support |
There are releases now and with go1.16+ |
Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to provide proper release versions and binaries along with them?
Today we hit a weird issue on our CI as github.com/otiai10/copy introduced a breaking change on their latest release and the way we were installing
go-licenses
was triggering this problem, our CI is a bit weird but so far we managed to solve it with some extra conf but having a binary we can just download and run would solve this kind of issue (not to mention that is also usually faster to do it like that)So leaving this here for consideration
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: