You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
Hello, I have been paying close attention to your new research, and thank you very much for the help your research has brought me. I have studied the nsff you proposed before and admire your new model DynIBaR for surpassing the nsff. I would like to ask you what is the core reason why DynIBaR can surpass nsff, is this ibrnet idea better than the nsff based on optical flow? If so, why does this ibrnet approach have this effect? Thank you very much for your answer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello, I have been paying close attention to your new research, and thank you very much for the help your research has brought me. I have studied the nsff you proposed before and admire your new model DynIBaR for surpassing the nsff. I would like to ask you what is the core reason why DynIBaR can surpass nsff, is this ibrnet idea better than the nsff based on optical flow? If so, why does this ibrnet approach have this effect? Thank you very much for your answer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: