You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From my simple benchmark for a util that is using snappy/gzip for compression,
I noticed that snappy is 10x faster than gzip in compression, but it's slower by 2x in decompression.
I'm wondering if I'm using incorrectly or whether this is an expected performance.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nvm. I forgot that compression performance highly depends on input.
I used random bytes, but whenI used random base64 string, snappy was better than gzip.
Hello,
From my simple benchmark for a util that is using snappy/gzip for compression,
I noticed that snappy is 10x faster than gzip in compression, but it's slower by 2x in decompression.
I'm wondering if I'm using incorrectly or whether this is an expected performance.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: