Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net: LookupSRV and search domains when name is empty #9391

Open
nikhilofthesouth opened this issue Dec 19, 2014 · 6 comments
Open

net: LookupSRV and search domains when name is empty #9391

nikhilofthesouth opened this issue Dec 19, 2014 · 6 comments
Labels
NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Milestone

Comments

@nikhilofthesouth
Copy link

Using Go 1.4 on Linux x86_64 (Ubuntu).

I called the lookupSRV function in the "net" package, with
lookupSRV("service", "tcp", "") (empty name).

I expected this to lookup using my search domains ("_service._tcp.my.search.domain"), but it potentially seems to have queried it with an extra "." ("_service._tcp..my.search.domain").

Is this intended? Or am I just using the function in a strange way? The workaround I'm using right now is to call lookupSRV("", "", "_service._tcp") instead.

@ianlancetaylor ianlancetaylor added this to the Go1.5 milestone Dec 19, 2014
@ianlancetaylor
Copy link
Member

You are using the function in a strange way but I can't think of a good reason why it shouldn't work.
@mikioh

@minux
Copy link
Member

minux commented Dec 19, 2014

We just need to add a special case for name=="" to src/net/lookup_*.go

@mikioh mikioh changed the title LookupSRV and search domains when name is empty net: LookupSRV and search domains when name is empty Dec 19, 2014
@zachgersh
Copy link

Have a change in review for this 😄
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/3569/

@mikioh
Copy link
Contributor

mikioh commented Feb 2, 2015

RFC 2782 clearly states that "Clients ask for a specific service/protocol for a specific domain (the word domain is used here in the strict RFC 1034 sense), and get back the names of any available servers." In mDNS, we use a new label "local." and in DNS-SD something more complicated. But those are requirements for protocols, not for built-in stub resolver implementation, API surfaces.

I wonder If we extend LookupSRV to be able to accept an empty string as a local domain or a wild card, what about other lookup APIs such as LookMX, LookupHost? Moreover, what if we extend both LookupSRV and LookupTXT to DNS-SD?

At this moment I have no concrete opinion on this issue, but fixing this issue with #8540 seems reasonable.

@zachgersh
Copy link

Hey @mikioh - thanks so much for the feedback (I also saw your comment on Gerrit). I wouldn't mind making these updates and solving #8540.

Would love to discuss some more details about the change you are suggesting (implementing DNS-SD) - maybe we move to an implementation discussion over on that issue?

@mikioh mikioh removed this from the Go1.5 milestone Feb 4, 2015
@rsc rsc added this to the Go1.5Maybe milestone Apr 10, 2015
@rsc rsc removed the repo-main label Apr 14, 2015
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

CL https://golang.org/cl/3569 mentions this issue.

@rsc rsc modified the milestones: Unplanned, Go1.5Maybe Jul 15, 2015
@seankhliao seankhliao added the NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. label Jul 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants