Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump pydantic from 2.7.2 to 2.9.2 #298

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 20, 2024

Bumps pydantic from 2.7.2 to 2.9.2.

Release notes

Sourced from pydantic's releases.

v2.9.2 (2024-09-17)

What's Changed

Fixes

Full Changelog: pydantic/pydantic@v2.9.1...v2.9.2

v2.9.1 (2024-09-09)

What's Changed

Fixes

Full Changelog: pydantic/pydantic@v2.9.0...v2.9.1

v2.9.0 (2024-09-05)

The code released in v2.9.0 is practically identical to that of v2.9.0b2.

Check out our blog post to learn more about the release highlights!

What's Changed

Packaging

New Features

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from pydantic's changelog.

v2.9.2 (2024-09-17)

GitHub release

What's Changed

Fixes

v2.9.1 (2024-09-09)

GitHub release

What's Changed

Fixes

v2.9.0 (2024-09-05)

GitHub release

The code released in v2.9.0 is practically identical to that of v2.9.0b2.

What's Changed

Packaging

New Features

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 7cedbfb history updates
  • 7eab2b8 v bump
  • c0a288f Fix ZoneInfo with various invalid types (#10408)
  • ea6115d Fix variance issue in _IncEx type alias, only allow True (#10414)
  • fbfe25a Fix serialization schema generation when using PlainValidator (#10427)
  • 26cff3c Adding notes on designing callable discriminators (#10400)
  • 8a0e7ad Do not error when trying to evaluate annotations of private attributes (#10358)
  • ecc5275 bump
  • 2c61bfd Fix evaluation of stringified annotations during namespace inspection (#10347)
  • 3d364cb Use correct types namespace when building namedtuple core schemas (#10337)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 20, 2024 16:20
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code labels Sep 20, 2024
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from jsnel September 20, 2024 16:20
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, dependabot[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Copy link
Contributor

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch glotaran/pyglotaran-extras/dependabot/pip/pydantic-2.9.2

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.31%. Comparing base (4d38e46) to head (004a8c1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #298      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.26%   58.31%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        1598     1600       +2     
  Branches      290      290              
==========================================
+ Hits          931      933       +2     
  Misses        651      651              
  Partials       16       16              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@s-weigand
Copy link
Member

@jsnel Besides the pydantic version bump the scheme generation now differentiates in the style between pydantic<2.9.0 and pydantic>=2.9.0 to generate schemes of consistent style.
Since pydantic>=2.9.0 removed a workaround in the scheme generation.

dependabot bot and others added 2 commits September 26, 2024 21:30
Bumps [pydantic](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic) from 2.7.2 to 2.9.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/blob/main/HISTORY.md)
- [Commits](pydantic/pydantic@v2.7.2...v2.9.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: pydantic
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@jsnel jsnel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not ideal having to maintain two versions of the config (even if just in the tests).

And at some point in the future I would invert the logic (check for smaller than, rather than greater than).

But otherwise this all looks fine.

Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 22, 2024

A newer version of pydantic exists, but since this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot I haven't updated it. You'll get a PR for the updated version as normal once this PR is merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants