You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can progressive cactus be coerced to align chromosomes end-to-end for multiple individuals of the same species? I have run progressive cactus, and the output alignments include multiple regions of a chromosome in the same alignment, it does not have the chromosomes aligned end-to-end. By comparison, cactus (not "progressive") provides this type of end-to-end chromosome alignment, but I am interested in the compute efficiency provided by progressive cactus to provide a similar output. I am working in corn (Zea mays), which has a large-ish genome (2.3Gb) and is highly repetitive with low sequence conservation in intergenic space, so scaling the cactus pipeline (not "progressive") to hundreds of corn individuals is a computational challenge.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can progressive cactus be coerced to align chromosomes end-to-end for multiple individuals of the same species? I have run progressive cactus, and the output alignments include multiple regions of a chromosome in the same alignment, it does not have the chromosomes aligned end-to-end. By comparison, cactus (not "progressive") provides this type of end-to-end chromosome alignment, but I am interested in the compute efficiency provided by progressive cactus to provide a similar output. I am working in corn (Zea mays), which has a large-ish genome (2.3Gb) and is highly repetitive with low sequence conservation in intergenic space, so scaling the cactus pipeline (not "progressive") to hundreds of corn individuals is a computational challenge.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: