Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More Sophisticated models for foreground subtraction #87

Open
rbmetcalf opened this issue Dec 10, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

More Sophisticated models for foreground subtraction #87

rbmetcalf opened this issue Dec 10, 2014 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@rbmetcalf
Copy link
Member

Thus far we have standard profiles for the lens galaxy subtraction. We might think about a model that just tries to interpolate the surface brightness across the region where the arc is. We are not really interested in whether the lens galaxy model fits the centre of the lens galaxy well, just in what it is doing where it intersects with the arc. This could both be more flexible and not weigh inflate the chi^2 by fitting pixels that we are not really interested in.

@ntessore ntessore added the idea label Dec 10, 2014
@ntessore
Copy link
Contributor

I think that could be achieved by masking the central part of the observation. We could try this for the horseshoe image @fabiobg83 just to see what happens.

@rbmetcalf
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, but it would still have perfect elliptical symmetry.

@ntessore
Copy link
Contributor

In the case of single strong lenses with clear Einstein ring, I suppose we could have a special annulus mask/source combination that takes care of the background sky and the central halo near the arc. This would free up > 10 parameters, which we can use to model probably all reasonable asymmetric cases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants