Not ignoring pluralisation

[i2chris]

It ignores datetime keys but the missing pluralisation keys still appear in the missing translations section. Is there a specific rule needed to ignore pluralisations?

ignore_missing:
  - '{datetime, activerecord, date, datetime,i18n, number, devise, spree, support, time, helpers}.*'

Missing translations (13) | i18n-tasks v0.9.29
+--------+------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| Locale | Key                                            | Value in other locales or source |
+--------+------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+
|   pl   | cannot_register_samples.counting               | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.about_x_hours       | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.about_x_months      | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.about_x_years       | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.almost_x_years      | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.less_than_x_minutes | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.less_than_x_seconds | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.over_x_years        | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.x_days              | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.x_minutes           | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.x_months            | few, many                        |
|   pl   | datetime.distance_in_words.x_seconds           | few, many                        |
|   pl   | you_are_adding_items_from_the_trolley.counting | few, many                        |
+--------+------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------+

[nitsujri]

Language specific ignore_missing doesn't work yet: #339

[davidwessman]

@glebm Closed by #389 ?

[glebm]

Yep!