Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest unwrapping when trying to access a field of a value wrapped in a Result #3645

Open
giacomocavalieri opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
discussion The approach has not yet been decided priority:low

Comments

@giacomocavalieri
Copy link
Member

In this code snippet:

pub fn main() {
  let response =
    request.new()
    |> request.set_host("pokeapi.co")
    |> request.set_path("api/v2/pokemon/ditto")
    |> httpc.send

  io.debug(response.body)
}

I get the following error:

error: Unknown record field
   ┌─ /src/goto.gleam:12:20
   │
12 │   io.debug(response.body)
   │                    ^^^^^ This field does not exist

The value being accessed has this type:

    Result(Response(String), Dynamic)

It does not have any fields.

It would be extra nice if the compiler could see that .body is a valid field access for the type wrapped in the Ok variant and suggest how to fix the problem:

error: Unknown record field
   ┌─ /src/goto.gleam:12:20
   │
12 │   io.debug(response.body)
   │                    ^^^^^ This field does not exist

The value being accessed has this type:

    Result(Response(String), Dynamic)

It does not have any fields.

Hint: if you want to access the `.body` field of a `Response` you
should first pattern match on the `Result`

    case response {
      Ok(response) -> io.debug(response.body)
      Error(_) -> todo as "deal with error case"
    }

It would also be nice to have a code action to fix this automatically

@lpil
Copy link
Member

lpil commented Sep 28, 2024

What's the motivation here? Has this been coming up a lot?

Why would you want it specialised to result?

@giacomocavalieri
Copy link
Member Author

Has this been coming up a lot?

No idea really 😁 It's just something random that came to mind the other day, so yeah it might be better to wait here

@lpil lpil added discussion The approach has not yet been decided priority:low labels Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion The approach has not yet been decided priority:low
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants