-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Get rid of OTS] Add an integration test for protected_secrets feature flag #11318
Closed
Tracked by
#10134
Labels
Comments
Thank you for creating this, @jenting ! 🙏 |
12 tasks
@jenting I am going to remove you for now. If you decide to do in the future, please assign yourself back. |
Consider using the identify related to this user token |
atduarte
changed the title
[workspace integration test] Add an integration for protected_secrets feature flag
[Get rid of OTS] Add an integration for protected_secrets feature flag
Sep 30, 2022
atduarte
changed the title
[Get rid of OTS] Add an integration for protected_secrets feature flag
[Get rid of OTS] Add an integration test for protected_secrets feature flag
Sep 30, 2022
Repository owner
moved this from In Progress
to Awaiting Deployment
in 🌌 Workspace Team
Sep 30, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
Add integration for the protected_secrets feature flag.
Describe the behaviour you'd like
Have an integration test for the protect_secrets feature flag, it'd be good to test both public and private repo is able to launch a workspace and stops the workspace where the context is a private Git repo (not a prebuild).
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
#11198
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: